Teachers with higher PCK levels demonstrate greater adaptability in addressing diverse student needs

Lyz Avendan˜o; Dilia Vela´zquez; Maria Emilia Guevara Estacio

doi:10.51574/hamka.v4i2.127

Authors

Lyz Avendan˜o Faculty of Legal and Social Sciences, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela
Dilia Vela´zquez Faculty of Legal and Social Sciences, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela
Maria Emilia Guevara Estacio
guevaram@usb.ve
Faculty of Legal and Social Sciences, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela

Keywords:

Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), Instructional Adaptability, Science Education, PCK Mapping

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates how variations in teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) levels directly influence real-time instructional adaptability when addressing diverse student learning needs in heterogeneous secondary STEM classrooms.

Method: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was implemented with 24 urban secondary science teachers stratified into high, moderate, and low PCK profiles. Data were gathered through baseline PCK rubric assessments, 72 observed 50-minute teaching sessions across a 12-week academic term, and post-lesson video-stimulated recall interviews, analyzed via one-way ANOVA and qualitative PCK mapping in NVivo.

Findings: Quantitative results revealed statistically significant differences in real-time adaptive behaviors across profile groups (), with high-PCK teachers demonstrating markedly higher adaptive frequency () compared to their low-PCK peers (). Qualitative mapping showed high-PCK teachers dynamically integrated diagnostic student knowledge with spontaneous scaffolding, whereas low-PCK teachers defaulted to rigid lesson scripts.

Practical implications: The findings demonstrate that teacher preparation and professional development must transition from generic instructional strategies to topic-specific PCK mapping, enabling educators to reduce real-time cognitive load and implement effective differentiated instruction.

Originality/value: This study provides novel empirical evidence illustrating the exact mechanisms through which enacted PCK map networks drive real-time pedagogical flexibility, offering an operational framework for adaptive teacher expertise in diverse learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041

Alonzo, A. C., Berry, A., & Nilsson, P. (2019). Unpacking the complexity of science teachers’ PCK in action: Enacted and personal PCK. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 273–288). Springer. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_12

Alonzo, A. C., & Kim, J. (2016). Declarative and dynamic pedagogical content knowledge as elicited through two video-based interview methods. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1259–1286. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21271

Barendsen, E., & Henze, Y. (2019). Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice using classroom observation. Research in Science Education, 49(4), 1141–1175. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z

Brown, P., Friedrichsen, P., & Abell, S. (2012). The development of secondary biology teachers PCK. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(5), 133–155. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9312-1

Caliboso, J., Bagalay, B., Nizar, A., & Ismail, M. (2024). Culture, Self, and Schooling: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. HAMKA INSIGHT, 4(1), 41–63. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/hamka.v4i1.110

Chan, K. K. H. (2022). A critical review of studies using the pedagogical content knowledge map approach. International Journal of Science Education, 44(3), 487–513. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2035011

Chan, K. K. H., & Yung, B. H. W. (2018). Developing pedagogical content knowledge for teaching a new topic: More than teaching experience and subject matter knowledge. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 233–265. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9567-1

Gao, S., Damico, N., & Gelfuso, A. (2021). Mapping and reflecting on integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for teaching natural selection: A case study of an experienced middle-school science teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, Article 103473. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103473

Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). Routledge.

Hand, B., Cavagnetto, A., Chen, Y.-C., & Park, S. (2016). Moving past curricula and strategies: Language and the development of adaptive pedagogy for immersive learning environments. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 223–241. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9499-1

Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716

Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007

Mapulanga, T., Ameyaw, Y., Nshogoza, G., & Bwalya, A. (2024). Integration of topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge components in secondary school science teachers’ reflections on biology lessons. Discover Education, 3(1), Article 104. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00104-y

Mapulanga, T., Nshogoza, G., & Yaw, A. (2022). Teachers’ perceived enacted pedagogical content knowledge in biology at selected secondary schools in Lusaka. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 418–435. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.23

McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936–972. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081

Mugume, T., & Katusiimeh, M. W. (2024). Professional competence: how specialized content knowledge shapes the identity and practice of teachers. HAMKA INSIGHT, 4(1), 86–110. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/hamka.v4i1.112

Nkolika, C. J. (2024). ChatGPT in the classroom: balancing transformative opportunities with pedagogical and ethical challenges. HAMKA INSIGHT, 4(1), 21–40. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/hamka.v4i1.124

Park, S., & Chen, Y.-C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922–941. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21022

Park, S., Jang, J. Y., Chen, Y. C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching?: Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 245–260. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9163-8

Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Soysal, Y. (2018). An exploration of the interactions among the components of an experienced elementary science teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Studies, 44(1), 1–25. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1331839

Suh, J. K., & Park, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and sustainability of an innovative science teaching approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 246–259. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.021

Susandi, A. D., & Navarro, L. J. (2024). Designing a realistic mathematics learning trajectory to promote fraction concept construction in elementary school. HAMKA INSIGHT, 4(1), 1–20. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.51574/hamka.v4i1.166

Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U

Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11431010