Analysis of Students' Mathematical Literacy in Curved-Surface Solids Based on Learning Motivation
Keywords:
curved-surface solids, learning motivation, mathematical literacy, PISA processes, secondary mathematicsAbstract
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to describe students' mathematical literacy in solving problems involving curved-surface solids according to low, moderate, and high levels of learning motivation.
Method: A descriptive qualitative design was employed. The participants were 10 ninth-grade students at MTs Miftahul Huda. Data were collected using three contextual mathematical literacy tasks, a 10-item learning motivation questionnaire, and follow-up interviews. Three focal participants representing low, moderate, and high learning motivation were selected for in-depth analysis.
Findings: Students with low learning motivation met few mathematical literacy indicators and had trouble identifying relevant information, constructing mathematical models, applying appropriate procedures, and interpreting results. Students with moderate motivation met several indicators but did not consistently present systematic solution processes or relate their results to the problem context.
Practical implications: Mathematics teachers should combine contextual problem-solving activities with strategies that strengthen persistence, confidence, and independent learning. Students with low learning motivation require structured scaffolding, feedback, and sustained encouragement, while students with higher motivation should receive opportunities for independent exploration and reflective problem solving.
Originality/value: This study provides a qualitative account of how mathematical literacy varies across three levels of learning motivation in the specific context of curved-surface solids. It integrates written solution analysis and interview evidence to explain students' performance in the PISA processes of formulating, employing, and interpreting mathematics.
Downloads
References
Andres, H. P. (2019). Active teaching to manage course difficulty and learning motivation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1357073
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1357073
Chan, S., Maneewan, S., & Koul, R. (2023). Teacher educators’ teaching styles: Relation with learning motivation and academic engagement in pre-service teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(8), 2044–2065. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1947226
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1947226
Dimyati, & Mudjiono. (2015). Belajar dan pembelajaran [Learning and instruction]. Rineka Cipta.
Gal, I., & Tout, D. (2014). Comparison of PIAAC and PISA frameworks for numeracy and mathematics (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 102). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz3wl63cs6f-en
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz3wl63cs6f-en
Genc, M., & Erbas, A. K. (2019). Secondary mathematics teachers' conceptions of mathematical literacy. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(3), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1516805
Graven, M., & Venkat, H. (2007). Emerging pedagogic agendas in the teaching of mathematical literacy. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2007.10740622
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2007.10740622
Hartono, Y., Darmawijoyo, & Zulkardi. (2019). Peran matematika dalam pengembangan kemampuan berpikir logis dan kritis siswa [The role of mathematics in developing students' logical and critical thinking skills]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 85–94.
Istiqomah, N., & Rahaju, E. B. (2014). Profil kemampuan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal bangun ruang sisi lengkung [Students' ability profiles in solving curved-surface solid problems]. MATHEdunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 1–8. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/8735
Juliani, R., Suyono, & Hidayat, W. (2016). Pembelajaran matematika dalam membentuk kemampuan berpikir rasional dan kritis siswa [Mathematics instruction in developing students' rational and critical thinking skills]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(1), 45–53.
Kompri. (2016). Motivasi pembelajaran perspektif guru dan siswa [Learning motivation from teachers' and students' perspectives]. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Kurniawati, R. P., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., & Kuncoro, T. (2026). Exploring truth-seeking characteristics based on logical reasoning in solving mathematical literacy problems. Cogent Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2611578
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2611578
Machaba, F., & Du Plooy, E. (2019). Teachers' mathematical literacy practices in mathematical modelling. Pythagoras, 40(1), Article a474. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v40i1.474
Machaba, F., & Du Plooy, M. (2019). Mathematics and mathematical literacy on the career podium – Sharing gold? African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(3), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1694782
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1694782
Mulaudzi, L., & Ngcobo, Z. A. (2026). Pedagogical reasons for teachers’ engagement or non-engagement with learner errors and misconceptions in measurement in Grade 12 mathematical literacy. Cogent Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2698793
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2698793
Muzaki, A., & Masjudin. (2019). Pengaruh pemahaman konsep bangun ruang sisi lengkung terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa [The effect of conceptual understanding of curved-surface solids on students' mathematics achievement]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 101–110. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpm
Nguyen, N. N. (2025). Factors contributing to learning motivation among social work students in Vietnam. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 45(4), 732–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2025.2539085
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2025.2539085
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Ozerem, A. (2012). Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh-grade students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557
Ozkale, A., & Ozdemir Erdogan, E. (2022). An analysis of the interaction between mathematical literacy and financial literacy in PISA. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(8), 1983–2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1842526
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1842526
Rehman, A. U., Bhuttah, T. M., & You, X. (2020). Linking burnout to psychological well-being: The mediating role of social support and learning motivation. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13, 545–554. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S250961
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S250961
Sari, R. P. (2015). Literasi matematika siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah kontekstual [Junior secondary students' mathematical literacy in solving contextual problems]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 181–192. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpm/article/view/9325
Tariq, V. N., Qualter, P., Roberts, S., Appleby, Y., & Barnes, L. (2013). Mathematical literacy in undergraduates: Role of gender, emotional intelligence and emotional self-efficacy. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(8), 1143–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.770087
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.770087
Thompson, A. S., & Erdil-Moody, Z. (2016). Operationalizing multilingualism: Language learning motivation in Turkey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.985631
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.985631
Tran, D. (2026). Measuring opportunities to develop mathematical literacy and their prediction on mathematical literacy outcomes. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2026.2652846
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2026.2652846
Yang, J. C., & Quadir, B. (2018). Individual differences in an English learning achievement system: Gaming flow experience, gender differences and learning motivation. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1460618
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 HAMKA INSIGHT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
