Examining the effect of group investigation cooperative learning on student science achievement and collaboration skills
Keywords:
Kooperative Learning, Group Investigation, Kerjasama, Hasil Belajar, IPAAbstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the pedagogical efficacy of the six-stage Group Investigation cooperative learning model on primary students' science achievement and collaboration skills, directly addressing cognitive and affective limitations associated with conventional teacher-directed instructional approaches in elementary science education.
Method: Employing a six-week quantitative, quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design, the research involved elementary students across intact classrooms. Data were gathered using a validated Science Achievement Test measuring higher-order cognitive domains alongside a dual-mode Collaboration Evaluation Framework comprising peer assessments and direct observations. Data were processed using multivariate and univariate analyses of covariance to control for baseline differences.
Findings: Multivariate analysis revealed a highly significant positive effect for Group Investigation on combined cognitive and interpersonal outcomes. Follow-up univariate testing demonstrated substantial, statistically significant gains in conceptual science mastery and peer collaboration skills compared to direct instruction, with high partial eta squared effect sizes confirming practical significance.
Practical implications: Findings provide elementary educators and curriculum designers with an actionable, scalable framework to simultaneously cultivate essential twenty-first-century collaboration competencies and deep conceptual science understanding.
Originality/value: This research offers novel empirical validation regarding scaffolded group investigation in primary education, demonstrating its capacity to bridge cognitive academic mastery and socio-emotional learning.
Downloads
References
Abrahams, I. (2009). Does practical work really motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2335–2353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802342836
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802342836
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: Evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093
Areepattamannil, S., Cairns, D., & Dickson, M. (2020). Teacher-directed versus inquiry-based science instruction: Investigating links to adolescent students’ science dispositions across 66 countries. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(6), 675–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1753309
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1753309
Burns, E. C., Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2019). Examining the yields of growth feedback from science teachers and students’ intrinsic valuing of science: Implications for student-and school-level science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(8), 1060–1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21546
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21546
Butterfuss, R., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2022). Strategy uptake in Writing Pal: Adaptive feedback and instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(3), 696–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211045304
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211045304
Cairns, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship between instructional practices and science achievement in an inquiry-based learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2113–2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1660927
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1660927
Chan, H., Cheung, K., & Erduran, S. (2023). Science communication in the media and human mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic: A time series and content analysis. Public Health, 218, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.03.001
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.03.001
Chang, Y. (2014). Science motivation across Asian countries: Links among future-oriented motivation, self-efficacy, task values, and achievement outcomes. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0176-3
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0176-3
Chen, Q. (2014). Using TIMSS 2007 data to build mathematics achievement model of fourth graders in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1519–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9505-x
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9505-x
Cheung, K. K. C., Chan, H., & Erduran, S. (2023). Communicating science in the COVID-19 news in the UK during Omicron waves: Exploring representations of nature of science with epistemic network analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01771-2
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01771-2
Childs, A., & Baird, J. A. (2020). General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) and the assessment of science practical work: An historical review of assessment policy. The Curriculum Journal, 31(3), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.20
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.20
Fong, C. J., Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., & Stautberg, S. (2019). A meta-analysis of negative feedback on intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 121–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9446-6
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9446-6
Gao, S. (2014). Relationship between science teaching practices and students’ achievement in Singapore, Chinese Taipei, and the US: An analysis using TIMSS 2011 data. Frontiers of Education in China, 9(4), 519–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397039
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397039
Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039
Gotwals, A. W. (2018). Where are we now? Learning progressions and formative assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408626
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408626
Gustafsson, J.-E., & Yang Hansen, K. (2018). Changes in the impact of family education on student educational achievement in Sweden 1988–2014. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306799
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306799
Hayes, K. N., & Trexler, C. J. (2016). Testing predictors of instructional practice in elementary science education: The significant role of accountability. Science Education, 100(2), 266–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21206
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21206
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hu, Z. (2022). Local meanings of international student assessments: An analysis of media discourses of PISA in China, 2010-2016. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(3), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1775553
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1775553
Jansen, M., Schroeders, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2014). Academic self-concept in science: Multidimensionality, relations to achievement measures, and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.003
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.003
Jansen, T., Meyer, J., Wigfield, A., & Möller, J. (2022). Which student and instructional variables are most strongly related to academic motivation in K-12 education? A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 148(1–2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000354
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000354
Jo, S., & Seo, Y. S. (2021). Does maths self-concept mediate the relation between instructional approaches and students’ maths achievement? Evidence from the U.S. TIMSS 2015 data. Research Papers in Education, 38(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1961294
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1961294
Kang, J. (2020). Interrelationship between inquiry-based learning and instructional quality in predicting science literacy. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09946-6
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09946-6
Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2012). The effect of guided-inquiry instruction on 6th grade Turkish students’ achievement, science process skills, and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942
Korous, K. M., Causadias, J. M., Bradley, R. H., Luthar, S. S., & Levy, R. (2022). A systematic overview of meta-analyses on socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, and achievement: The need to focus on specific pathways. Psychological Reports, 125(1), 55–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120984127
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120984127
Kruiper, S. M., Leenknecht, M. J., & Slof, B. (2022). Using scaffolding strategies to improve formative assessment practice in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1927981
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1927981
Lau, K. C., & Ho, S. C. E. (2022). Attitudes towards science, teaching practices, and science performance in PISA 2015: Multilevel analysis of the Chinese and Western top performers. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09954-6
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09954-6
Lau, K. C., & Lam, T. Y. P. (2017). Instructional practices and science performance of 10 top-performing regions in PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2128–2149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1387947
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1387947
Lay, Y. F., Ng, K. T., & Chong, P. S. (2013). Analyzing affective factors related to eighth grade learners’ science and mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2007. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0163-0
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0163-0
Liou, P. Y. (2021). Students’ attitudes toward science and science achievement: An analysis of the differential effects of science instructional practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21643
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21643
Liou, P. Y., & Ho, J. H. N. (2016). Relationships among instructional practices, students’ motivational beliefs and science achievement in Taiwan using hierarchical linear modelling. Research Papers in Education, 33(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1236832
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1236832
Long, H., Gao, S., Yang, L., & Chen, J. (2022). Do teaching practices and enjoyment of science matter to science achievement? Psychology in the Schools, 59(2), 334–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22611
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22611
Maricuțoiu, L. P., & Sulea, C. (2019). Evolution of self-efficacy, student engagement and student burnout during a semester. A multilevel structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 76, 101785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101785
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101785
Oliver, M., McConney, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2021). The efficacy of inquiry-based instruction in science: A comparative analysis of six countries using PISA 2015. Research in Science Education, 51(S2), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09901-0
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09901-0
Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
Pun, J. K., & Cheung, K. K. (2023). Meaning making in collaborative practical work: A case study of multimodal challenges in a Year 10 chemistry classroom. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(1), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1895101
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1895101
Pun, J. K. H., Fu, X., & Cheung, K. K. (2023). Language challenges and coping strategies in English Medium Instruction (EMI) science classrooms: A critical review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2188704
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2188704
Rogers, J. R., & Fraser, B. J. (2023). Sex and frequency of practical work as determinants of middle-school science students’ learning environment perceptions and attitudes. Learning Environments Research, 26(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09426-w
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09426-w
Salchegger, S., Wallner-Paschon, C., & Bertsch, C. (2021). Explaining Waldorf students’ high motivation but moderate achievement in science: Is inquiry-based science education the key? Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00107-3
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00107-3
Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Lacante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000026609.94841.2f
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000026609.94841.2f
Tan, C. Y. (2024). Direct and indirect influences of familial socioeconomic status on students’ science achievement. Oxford Review of Education, 50(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2022.2139672
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2022.2139672
Toplis, R. (2012). Students’ views about secondary school science lessons: The role of practical work. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9209-6
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9209-6
Wan, Z. H., Zhan, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Positive or negative? The effects of scientific inquiry on science achievement via attitudes toward science. Science Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.2182522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21825
Yan, Z., & Chiu, M. M. (2023). The relationship between formative assessment and reading achievement: A multilevel analysis of students in 19 countries/regions. British Educational Research Journal, 49(1), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3837
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3837
Yan, Z., King, R. B., & Haw, J. Y. (2021). Formative assessment, growth mindset, and achievement: Examining their relations in the East and the West. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(5–6), 676–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1988510
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1988510
Yeung, S. Y. S. (2009). Is student-centered pedagogy impossible in Hong Kong? The case of inquiry in classrooms. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(3), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9028-x
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9028-x
Yung, B. H. W., Zhu, Y., Wong, S. L., Cheng, M. W., & Lo, F. Y. (2013). Teachers’ and students’ conceptions of good science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 35(14), 2435–2461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.629375
Crossref DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.629375
Zhang, D., Wang, C., & Yang, Y. (2021). The association between cognitive activation and mathematics achievement: A multiple mediation model. Educational Psychology, 41(6), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1917520
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 HAMKA INSIGHT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
